Did you know that koi herpesvirus can infect and cause disease in other species?

I know that most herpesviruses are relatively host-specific, however there are a few exceptions – the simian cercopithecine herpes B virus (which can infect monkeys and humans) and Aujeszky’s disease virus (which affects pigs and a wide range of other animals including cattle, sheep, goats, dogs, cats, mink, foxes, raccoons and rats). Malignant catarrhal fever is another herpesvirus that when it jumps from its natural sheep host to infect cattle, produces severe acute disease that is almost always fatal!

Recent research has demonstrated that although KHV doesn’t cause overt disease in other hosts, it IS capable of infecting them. After mentioning all those other diseases previously, it makes me wonder if under certain circumstances, the KHV may produce disease in other species it is capable of infecting (e.g. viral mutation, immunosuppression, environmental thermal changes, etc). Think about gallid herpesvirus 2 (Marek’s disease virus) picked up an oncogene somewhere along its evolution (M. Bennett, pers. comm).

Dr Sven Bergman and co. in Germany have been working on KHV and recently, they found that not only were carp dying, but it could also infect tench and roach! This information will soon be published and we are privileged to be among the first to know.

The information below are extracts from scientific papers published by Dr Sven Bergman and co. in Germany (provided with permission from the author).

I have forwarded these papers to the lead Australian scientist, Dr Ken McCol, who is planning to inflict this virus on carp and the like, to appeal to his better judgement to abandon his project.

The key sentences to support the prevention of KHV release in Australia are in bold.

How Host Specific is Infection with Koi Herpesvirus (KHV) for Real?
S.M. Bergmann1*, J. Kempter2, D. Fichtner1
1 Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Federal Research Institute for Animal Health, Institute of Infectology,
Sudufer 10, 17493 Greifswald-Insel Riems, Germany (* sven.bergmann@fli.bund.de)
2 Agricultural University, Department of Aquaculture, K. Krolewicza 4, 71-550 Szczecin, Poland

Key words: KHV infection, detection methods, nested PCR, non Cyprinus carpio species
Contrary to the theory of host specificity of herpesviral infections, channel catfish herpesvirus
(CCV) is able to infect more than one species, e.g., blue catfish (Ictaluris furcatus), channel catfish
(Ictaluris punctatus), and white catfish (Ictaluris catus). Although African catfish (Clarias
gariepinus), Asian catfish (Clarias batrachus), and other species are resistant to clinical CCV infection,
CCV infected a mammalian cell line obtained from Hawaiian monk seal (Monachus schauinslandi).
Due to these findings, we sought more host species in the framework of koi herpesvirus
(KHV) infection (KHVI). KHV disease (KHVD) occurs only in Cyprinus carpio (common carp and
koi). Among other species, we tested goldfish (Carassius auratus), crucian carp (C. carassius),
tech (Tinca tinca), grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella), bighead (Aristichthys nobilis), silver carp
(Hypophthalmichthys molitrix), sheatfish (Silurus glanis), sturgeon species (Acipenser gueldenstaedtii,
A. oxyrhynchus, A. ruthenus), and ornamental fish by different PCRs. All non Cyprinus
carpio fish had never expressed any clinical sign of KHVD. Using different methods for DNA
extraction (clumbs, fluid reagents) from different organs (organs, swabs, smears, blood, etc.), KHV
DNA was detected in most of the experimentally or naturally-infected fish by nested PCR. Positive
PCR results were confirmed by in situ hybridization using different probes, by sequencing of PCR
products, or by immunofluorescence assay using polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies developed
against KHV. In the same framework we tried to establish and test the sensitivity of non-lethal sampling
methods, e.g., separation of leukocytes or gill swabs. Our aim was to exclude or detect KHVI
in fish (carriers) that were in contact with KHV-infected carp or other fish affected by KHVI.

The Israeli Journal of Aquaculture – Bamidgeh 61(3), 2009
Detection of koi herpes virus (KHV) genome in apparently healthy fish.
S. M. Bergmann1*, H. Schütze1, U. Fischer1, D. Fichtner1,

M. Riechardt1, K. Meyer3, D. Schrudde1 and J. Kempter2

1 Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Federal Research Institute for Animal Health, Institute of Infectology,
Südufer 10, 17493 Greifswald-Insel Riems, Germany; 2 Agricultural University, Department of
Aquaculture, K. Królewicza4, 71-550 Szczecin, Poland; 3 Veterinary High school, Hannover, Bünteweg
17, 30559 Hannover, Germany

Abstract
Koi herpesvirus (KHV) induces a lethal disease in species belonging to Cyprinus carpio, covering
common carp and koi or fancy carp. To date, other cyprinid fish species kept together with KHV
infected carp or koi, such as goldfish (Carassius auratus) or grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella) had
never shown any sign of KHV infection. Unexplainable outbreaks of KHV infection in common
carp or koi led to the suspicion that more disease influencing factors exist, than so far explained. In
challenge experiments and by natural routes of infection, it has been demonstrated that naive carp
or koi can be infected by the following mechanisms; exposure to water from severe KHV diseased
fish, co-habitation with KHV infected carp, by injection or immersion with cell supernatant of KHV
infected cultures. Experiments were conducted to determine if apparently healthy koi (carriers/
survivors) or non-Cyprinus carpio species stocked with KHV infected carp could become infected.
The study proved that these species were able to transfer KHV to naïve carp. As a result scientists
suspected that some ornamental fish species could act as reservoirs of KHV infection.
In this study goldfish, grass carp, blue back ide (Leuciscus idus) and Ancistrus sp. were screened
with routinely used diagnostic methods such as virus isolation in cell cultures and PCR and found
to be KHV negative. This suggested that these fish species could not be infected by KHV. However,
when using a more sensitive nested PCR, KHV DNA was detected from some of these fish. As
confirmative methods sequence analysis of the nested PCR products and in-situ hybridization with
different KHV probes were used. This study showed that the following cyprinid species; goldfish,
grass carp and ide, and also non-cyprinid species Ancistrus sp. may act as a carrier of KHV.

Bull. Eur. Ass. Fish Pathol., 29(5) 2009, 145

KOI HERPES VIRUS: DO ACIPENSERID RESTITUTION PROGRAMS POSE A THREAT TO CARP FARMS IN THE DISEASE-FREE ZONES?
Jolanta KEMPTER 1*, Jacek SADOWSKI 1, Heike SCHÜTZE 2, Uwe FISCHER 2, Malte
DAUBER 2, Dieter FICHTNER 2, Remigiusz PANICZ 1, and Sven M. BERGMANN 2

1West Pomeranian University of Technology, Division of Aquaculture, Szczecin, Poland
2 Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Federal Research Institute for Animal Health, Suedufer 10,
17493 Greifswald-Insel Riems, Germany
Kempter J., Sadowski J., Schütze H., Fischer U., Dauber M., Fichtner D., Panicz R., Bergmann S.M. 2009.

Background. Sturgeons have long been extinct in Polish inland waters. A substantial effort has recently been put
into their restitution, covering the drainage areas of two major Polish rivers, the Oder and the Vistula. The
stocked fishes are clinically healthy, but very little is known about their potential to transmit viral diseases including
koi herpes virus (KHV) to healthy fishes of other species, which may pose a threat to the disease-free zones.
This study was intended to determine if sturgeons could be asymptomatic carriers of KHV.
Materials and Methods. A total of 29 sturgeons (two species; length 8–37 cm) originating from fish farms in
northern Poland with a known KHV history in common carp or koi in the area were examined: 15 Russian sturgeons,
Acipenser gueldenstaedtii, with clinical signs of a disease and 14 asymptomatic Atlantic sturgeons,
A. oxyrinchus. The former were sent to the laboratory alive while the latter were sent fixed in ethanol. As it is
required for detection of a latent KHV infection in acipenserids, two independent procedures were applied. The
preliminary results were obtained using PCR. Those findings were subsequently confirmation by nested PCR. The
latter procedure consists of sequence analysis of PCR products and direct detection of KHV infected cells in tissue
materials by in-situ hybridization on nucleic acid level or indirect immunofluorescence on KHV protein level.
Results. KHV genome parts were found in nine Russian sturgeons and four Atlantic sturgeons. Comparison of
PCR results obtained from three primer pairs used for KHV diagnostic in sturgeon showed that those designed
by Bercovier et al. (2005) were most sensitive and robust for this purpose. In order to confirm the presence of
viral particles the most useful method was in-situ hybridization (ISH), allowing the detection of KHV in gill samples
obtained from live sturgeons.
Conclusion. This preliminary study shows that sturgeons can be carriers of KHV. Therefore a viral diagnostics
is highly recommended not only for sturgeons obtained from the environment but also for fertilized eggs, fry, and
fish intended for re-stocking measurements of inland waters.
Keywords: Koi herpesvirus, Acipenser gueldenstaedtii, Russian sturgeon, Acipenser oxyrinchus, Atlantic sturgeon,
PCR, nested PCR, ISH, iIFA

ACTA ICHTHYOLOGICA ET PISCATORIA (2009) 39 (2): 119–126

20120810-075121.jpg

A pat on the back for the World Aquatic Veterinary Medical Association.

This was an impromptu email to the World Aquatic Veterinary Medical Association (WAVMA) from a new veterinary graduate, commending the WAVMA (and my book!) on the great work that’s being done in progressing aquatic veterinary medicine.

 

From: Chad Harris
Date: Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 9:49 PM
Subject: Thank you all!
To: WAVMA

WAVMA Members,
I am a recent graduate from Ross University practicing in Austin, Texas. I have been following your posts and reading TONS of material, including Dr. Loh’s book, which has given me a wealth of “just scratching the surface” knowledge. As we all know, it is unfortunate that we do not get more exposure to fish/aquatic medicine in school. Long story short, I am attempting to bring fish medicine and surgery into my practice and I saw my first patient, Leo the fancy lionhead goldfish yesterday. Thanks to all of your posts, I didn’t skip a beat and Leo is doing much better today! If any of you have any tips/tools of the trade to send my way, by all means don’t hesitate.

Thank you so much,

Dr. Chad Harris, DVM
North Austin Animal Hospital
Austin, TX

 

Check out WAVMA by clicking on this link.

Check out Dr Loh’s books by clicking on this link.

 

20120810-074541.jpg

What does it mean if fish have “dropsy”?

Dropsy is not a disease diagnosis, but is actually a descriptive term for the clinical signs observed in fish. The term has often been misused as being diagnostic for bacterial disease, when all it actually means is an abnormal accumulation of fluid in a body cavity or in the subcutaneous tissues. Another medical term that can be used is anasarca. Grossly, the scales of the fish will protrude from the body (due to subcutaneous oedema), giving them the classic “pine cone” appearance. Fluid may also accumulate in the coelomic cavity, giving them a “pot-belly” appearance. This condition is limited to fishes in a freshwater environment and the reason for this is explained in the following sentence. Fishes that live in freshwater are in a hypo-osmotic environment. And so, if there are any severe external lesions (e.g. large skin ulcers from bacterial infection or severe gill damage from fungal infections), there could be a net influx of fluid into the body. If the kidneys are damaged such that normal excretion of urine is reduced, dropsy can also result. The prognosis is poor and such fish should be euthanased. It is useful to examine the diseased fish immediately post-euthanasia to identify the reason for the disease to prevent it from occurring in its tankmates.

To summarise, the cause of dropsy is not limited to bacterial infection, but it can occur as a result of skin disease, gill disease, renal disease or congestive heart failure which can have a variety of aetiologies.

 

20120810-074429.jpg

Gardening Australia interviews The Fish Vet.

I’ve just got off the phone interview with the journalist. Pet of the month will be goldfish! Keep an eye out for the article!

How can you tell if your fish is being attacked? What to do?

bitten fins will be frayed at the ends. The best way to tell is to observe them from a distance. If this is happening, then it means that the fish are not a good mix. They should be separated (almost like a divorce!). The fish being bullied should be placed in a proper fish tank with cycled filter, rock salt added at 2-5g/L and Melafix added.

A “dick head” fish!

Literally! Fish with genitals on its head!

http://www.newscientist.com/mobile/article/dn22023-zoologger-the-fish-with-its-genitals-on-its-head.html

Why do I get algal problems in my pond despite having low nitrate levels?

Nitrate levels may be low, but have you checked what the phosphate levels are? Pictured below is an example of what good water quality analysis will show up. The nitrate level (right) is a low 10mg/L, but notice the phosphate level (left) falls between 5-10mg/L (using the highest dilution factor)! Phosphate levels should be maintained below 1mg/L to help reduce algal problems. This is one example where no matter how much chemicals you keep adding to the pond, it won’t have a long term effect.

So where to from here? I would advise the owner to perform several water changes immediately. Then, check what type of foods they are feeding them. Poor quality foods tend to foul the water in this way because the nutrients in the are not as easily assimilated by the fish (see previous post). Providing shade and using natural barley extract can also help. If reaching for chemicals, simazine is one that’s safe to use with fish. More thorough look at algae and treatments can be found in a previous post – see link.

20120809-132817.jpg

Waterproof iPhone covers.

Following on from my last post of drowning digicams, I was referred to a website for good deals on the like. Would you trust this waterproof iPhone case with your phone?

http://shashinki.com/shop/dicapac-wpi10-waterproof-iphone-case-white-iphone-iphone-iphone-iphone-iphone-p-7716.html

Are waterproof cameras really waterproof?

Every aquatic veterinarian needs to have one of these. But for me, I’ve had three of these and am soon onto my fourth! I’ve had two Olympus tough cameras with specs for being waterproof to 10m and it drowned at a max depth of 4m when doing a shark dive at AQWA when examining the fishes in the aquarium. So I moved on to Pansonic’s Lumix a couple of years ago. This one is apparently shock proof to 1.5m, but the casing has given way and I’m afraid that it’s no longer waterproof. I guess I’ve yet to try Canon, Nikon, Sony and Fuji. What are your experiences with them?

20120809-111004.jpg