Read more
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2013/130109-shark-embryo-freeze-predator-animals-science
Sex video of deep-sea squid.
Shrimp Pathology Short Course will be conducted from June 3-14th, 2013.
This course is taught byDr. Donald Lightner and his colleagues from the Aquaculture Pathology Laboratory at the University of Arizona. This intensive course consists of comprehensive lectures and practical laboratory training that is focused on current methods used to diagnose, prevent, and treat the principal diseases of cultured penaeid shrimp. This program also provides an excellent opportunity for participants to meet and interact with others involved in shrimp disease research and management.
More information available at
http://microvet.arizona.edu/research/aquapath/index.htm
Department of Veterinary Science and Microbiology
The University of Arizona, Building 90, Room 102
1117 E. Lowell St.
Tucson, Arizona 85721, USA.
FAX: (520) 621-4899
Tel: (520) 621-4438
E-mail: dvl@email.arizona.edu; ritar@email.arizona.edu
This information brought to my attention from WAVMA’s email list-serve.
Today’s question is about Siamese fighting fish – how should they be housed…
The question I received on email today:
I had someone ask me the other day about Siamese Fighting Fish, and the best way that they should be housed. It basically stemmed from the fact that this person had seen at a local petshop a fishtank filled with different kinds of fish, also containing 3 very small transparent boxes each with a Fighting fish in it. She was concerned that this was poor animal welfare for the fish. So, I was just wondering what sized tanks Fighting Fish need, whether they need to be housed alone/just away from other Fighting Fish/ or can be housed in sight of other Fighting Fish.
My response:
Siamese fighters are adapted to surviving in small puddles seasonally (when the water bodies dry up) and would prefer larger bodies of water to live in. As their name suggests, they are from the tropics (Siam is old for Thailand) and so they ought to be kept in water at a temperature of around 24degC. This can be maintained either with a heater in the water, a heated pad beneath the tank or by warming up the room.
Hikkui Disease in Koi (Cyprinus carpio).
There’s a great article written by my colleague on this issue in koi fish on page 16 of this newsletter –
http://www.wavma.org/media/Documents-for-download/AVN-2011-5(2).pdf
A comment on the use of nematodes as larval feeds.
I suspect this research paper (link to the paper) had its roots in ornamental freshwater fish breeding since the culture methods for vinegar eels is in virtually every fish breeding text that’s out there. When I was younger, I often wondered what are these vinegar eels? Where do they come from? Do they just materialised out of thin air? Just some apple cider vinegar or oatmeal and you get microworms or vinegar eels.
This comment was by Wadim Kapulkin on my Facebook Fanpage. He has great insight and thought I’d share it on my other social media platforms. Thanks Wadim!
— |
Follow me on: Facebook "Fin Page" – YouTube – Blog – Linkedin – Twitter
—
Yours sincerely,
Dr Richmond Loh
BSc, BVMS, MPhil (Vet Path), MANZCVS (Aquatics), MANZCVS (Pathobiology), DipPM.
Veterinarian | Adjunct Senior Lecturer Murdoch University | WAVMA President-Elect |
Secretary Aquatic Animal Health Chapter – Australian and New Zealand College of Veterinary Scientists (ANZCVS)
The Fish Vet, Perth, Western Australia, AUSTRALIA. Mobile Veterinary Medical & Diagnostic Services for fish and other aquatic creatures.
http://www.thefishvet.com.au
Ph: +61 (0)421 822 383
Study on the use of nematodes as alternatives to artemia as live larval feed.
Innovative solution to the issue of everyone wanting their share of artemia.
| Journal of the World Aquaculture Society | |||||||||||||||||
| Volume 43, Number 6 (December 2012) | |||||||||||||||||
| Nematodes as Live Food in Larviculture – A Review | |||||||||||||||||
| Authors: | Jens Brüggemann 1 | ||||||||||||||||
| Author Affiliations: |
|
||||||||||||||||
| Source: | Journal of the World Aquaculture Society, Volume 43, Number 6 (December 2012) | ||||||||||||||||
| Page Numbers: | 739 – 763 | ||||||||||||||||
| Available Full Text: |
|
||||||||||||||||
| Abstract: | Live feeds are essential in larval nutrition of many fish and crustacean species. As the consumers’ demand for aquaculture products is growing rapidly, the demand for live feeds in larviculture is increasing as well. To satisfy the growing demand, research has taken steps to develop new innovative live feeds. Several studies focused on nematodes as a potential food source for larvae. Production methods, culture media, harvest, and enrichment procedures for nematodes presented in these studies are reviewed here. Many studies fed nematodes to different species of fish and crustaceans to test applicability in larval nutrition. The results of these feeding trials in terms of larval performance as well as ingestion and digestion of nematodes in the larvae’s gut are reviewed here as well. In addition, a summary of advantages and disadvantages of nematodes as live food and an outlook on future challenges of production and application of nematodes in larviculture are also presented. | ||||||||||||||||
| Citation: | Jens Brüggemann . Nematodes as Live Food in Larviculture – A Review. Journal of the World Aquaculture Society, Volume 43, Number 6 (December 2012), pp. 739-763, <http://ejournals.ebsco.com/direct.asp?ArticleID=48DEAE43EDB19754BF8D> | ||||||||||||||||
| URL: | http://ejournals.ebsco.com/direct.asp?ArticleID=48DEAE43EDB19754BF8D | ||||||||||||||||
Effect of ultraviolet (UV) radiation on the abundance and respiration rates of probiotic bacteria.
One of my clients is a stickler for maintaining balance in the aquaria, not wanting to use medicines whenever possible. This is a valid approach from a biologist point of view and has a place in larger environments. Sometimes however, in an artificial aquarium system where there is a higher than normal stocking densities, a veterinary approach may be more appropriate. But the balanced approach is particularly important when dealing with bacteria, whether you’re using antibiotics, or water disinfection tools.
This article details the effects of UV on beneficial bacteria.
| Aquaculture Research | |||||||||||||||||
| Volume 44, Number 2 (January 2013) | |||||||||||||||||
| |
Effect of ultraviolet (UV) radiation on the abundance and respiration rates of probiotic bacteria. | ||||||||||||||||
| Authors: | M. Angélica Garrido-Pereira, André Luiz Braga, Andréa Ferretto da Rocha, Luís André Sampaio, Paulo César Abreu | ||||||||||||||||
| Author Affiliations: |
|
||||||||||||||||
| Source: | Aquaculture Research, Volume 44, Number 2 (January 2013) | ||||||||||||||||
| Page Numbers: | 261 – 267 | ||||||||||||||||
| Available Full Text: |
|
||||||||||||||||
| Abstract: | Effects of ultraviolet radiation (UV) on probiotic bacteria (Bacillus subtilisand B. licheniformis) were tested in two experiments, with the following treatments: (i) UVtreatment – using fluorescent and UV-lamps and (ii) Control – CTRL, using fluorescent lamps. Bacterial abundance and respiration were evaluated every 24 h for 3 days for Experiment 1, and at 0, 6 and 24 h for Experiment 2. In the Experiment 1, total UVdose was 4 336.41 mW cm-2. UVtreatment presented small respiration rates only on day 3, while in the CTRLoxygen consumption was always high. On all days, the abundance of the Bacilliexposed to UVwas significantly smaller than that of the CTRL. The second experiment, with total UVdose of 1 445.47 mW cm-2, presented oxygen consumption in the UVtreatment only during the first 6 h. In the CTRL, oxygen consumption increased from the beginning due to the bigger abundance Bacillicells. Small coccus-shaped bacteria ocurred in the UVtreatment of both experiments. It may be concluded that exposure to UV, normally used for water disinfection, can inactivate probiotic bacteria. | ||||||||||||||||
| Citation: | M. Angélica Garrido-Pereira, André Luiz Braga, Andréa Ferretto da Rocha, Luís André Sampaio, Paulo César Abreu . Effect of ultraviolet (UV) radiation on the abundance and respiration rates of probiotic bacteria. Aquaculture Research, Volume 44, Number 2 (January 2013), pp. 261-267, <http://ejournals.ebsco.com/direct.asp?ArticleID=4B39AD4953156DF27216> | ||||||||||||||||
| URL: | http://ejournals.ebsco.com/direct.asp?ArticleID=4B39AD4953156DF27216 | ||||||||||||||||
Using decapsulated Artemia cysts as fry food.
I’ve made numerous diagnoses of newly hatched fry dying from starvation despite been given access to plenty of Artemia. The main reason for this is the capsule/shell of the cysts cause gut blockage. So, it is very important to separate the Artemia from their capsules. If this proves difficult, there are means of decapsulating the cysts prior to trying to hatch them (e.g. using chlorine).
But what if your Artemia are of poor quality, having poor hatch rates? This article is interesting because it demonstrates that unhatched, decapsulated cysts can still provide good nutritional value once the fry are big enough to take them.
| Aquaculture Research | |||||||||||||||||
| Volume 44, Number 2 (January 2013) | |||||||||||||||||
| |
Decapsulated Artemiacysts of different quality (high or low hatch-rate) as direct food for tench (Tinca tincaL.) larvae | ||||||||||||||||
| Authors: | Jesús D. Celada, Vanesa García, José M. Carral, María Sáez-Royuela, Rocío González, Álvaro González | ||||||||||||||||
| Author Affiliations: |
|
||||||||||||||||
| Source: | Aquaculture Research, Volume 44, Number 2 (January 2013) | ||||||||||||||||
| Page Numbers: | 167 – 175 | ||||||||||||||||
| Available Full Text: |
|
||||||||||||||||
| Abstract: | Three 30-day experiments were conducted to evaluate decapsulated Artemiacysts with different quality (high or low hatch-rate) as food for tench (Tinca tincaL.) larvae from the onset of exogenous feeding. In experiment 1, three diets were tested: Artemianauplii-only or cysts-only for 30 days, and nauplii for the first 7 days and cysts thereafter. The cysts used had 86% hatching rate (high hatch-rate cysts). The same feeding treatments were replicated in experiment 2 but with low hatch-rate cysts (10% hatching rate). In experiment 3, five diets were tested: high hatch-rate cysts only or low hatch-rate cysts only for 30 days, and nauplii for the first 7, 4 or 2 days and low hatch-rate cysts thereafter. In overall, survival was high, except with the low hatch-rate cysts only diet. Feeding tench larvae with cysts resulted in higher growth and lower FCRcompared to feeding with live nauplii only. High hatch-rate Artemiacysts are a suitable food from the onset of exogenous feeding and low hatch-rate cysts can be successfully used after 2–7 days feeding on nauplii. | ||||||||||||||||
| Citation: | Jesús D. Celada, Vanesa García, José M. Carral, María Sáez-Royuela, Rocío González, Álvaro González . Decapsulated Artemiacysts of different quality (high or low hatch-rate) as direct food for tench (Tinca tincaL.) larvae. Aquaculture Research, Volume 44, Number 2 (January 2013), pp. 167-175, <http://ejournals.ebsco.com/direct.asp?ArticleID=4B8993597532109BC927> | ||||||||||||||||
| URL: | http://ejournals.ebsco.com/direct.asp?ArticleID=4B8993597532109BC927 | ||||||||||||||||
Fish Joke for Monday-itis: dry humour

